Judge will not dismiss lawsuit claiming Poland Spring water is not from a spring

Key Points

  • A federal judge in Connecticut refused to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Poland Spring of falsely labeling its water as "spring water."
  • The judge questioned whether Poland Spring's water met the legal definition of spring water in eight states.
  • Plaintiffs claim that Poland Spring's water does not come from a natural spring, alleging the actual spring ran dry decades ago.
  • Nestle Waters, now Primo Brands, argued that their product complied with FDA definitions and state regulations for spring water.
  • The judge dismissed some claims but allowed the case to proceed on the issue of whether the water source qualifies as spring water.

Summary

In a significant legal development, a federal judge in Connecticut has allowed a class action lawsuit against the former Nestle Waters North America, now Primo Brands, to move forward. The lawsuit, initiated in 2017, accuses the company of misleading consumers by labeling Poland Spring water as "spring water" when it allegedly does not meet the legal criteria for this designation in several states. The contention centers on whether the water, which consumers claim does not originate from a natural spring, can be legally sold as "spring water." Despite Nestle's defense that their product adheres to FDA and state regulations, the judge highlighted discrepancies, particularly noting the use of man-made springs and surface water. This ruling keeps alive the debate over the authenticity of Poland Spring's water source, with implications for consumer trust and regulatory compliance in the bottled water industry.

yahoo
December 31, 2024
Crypto
Read article

Related news