Key Points
- Eden Gallery argued that NFT holders' losses are due to market forces, not fraud or misrepresentation.
- The gallery seeks dismissal of a class-action lawsuit by 36 NFT owners alleging fraud and unjust enrichment.
- The Meta Eagle Club NFTs, which sold for $13 million, have significantly dropped in value since their launch in 2022.
- Eden Gallery claims that the NFT market's general decline does not indicate wrongdoing on their part.
- The gallery also disputes the aggregation of claims, stating individual claims do not meet the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold.
Summary
Eden Gallery is defending itself against a class-action lawsuit from 36 NFT holders of the "Meta Eagle Club" collection, arguing that any losses incurred by the plaintiffs are due to market forces rather than fraud or misrepresentation. The gallery, in a motion to dismiss filed in a New York federal court, stated that the NFTs were a digital art product, not an investment, and that the market for NFTs has generally declined since the collection's launch in early 2022. The Meta Eagle Club NFTs, which initially sold for around $1,800 each, are now trading at about $17. The plaintiffs allege that they overpaid due to misrepresentations by the gallery and are seeking damages. However, Eden Gallery contends that the claims do not meet the necessary jurisdictional threshold for aggregation and should be dismissed. Despite a recent uptick in NFT sales, the sector remains significantly down from its peak in early 2022.