Prediction Markets Don't Have a Gambling Problem, Says Crypto Attorney

Key Points

  • Singapore and Thailand banned Polymarket, arguing it's a gambling platform.
  • Crypto attorney Aaron Brogan argues that prediction markets differ fundamentally from gambling.
  • Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi act as neutral intermediaries, not taking sides in bets.
  • Federal law in the U.S. preempts state gambling laws for registered Designated Contract Markets (DCMs).
  • New entrants like Crypto.com are entering the prediction market space, potentially disrupting traditional sportsbooks.

Summary

Singapore and Thailand have recently banned Polymarket, labeling it as a gambling platform due to its sports prediction markets. However, New York-based crypto attorney Aaron Brogan argues that prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi are fundamentally different from traditional gambling. Unlike state-licensed gambling products where the house bets against the users, prediction markets act as neutral intermediaries, earning revenue through transaction fees rather than taking sides in bets. This distinction changes the incentives and structure of the product, making it more about understanding, hedging, and creating public goods rather than gambling. In the U.S., prediction markets registered as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs) are regulated under federal law, which preempts state gambling regulations. This legal framework allows platforms like Kalshi to operate without state interference, while unregistered platforms like Polymarket could face legal challenges. New players like Crypto.com are also entering this space, potentially disrupting the $21 billion sports betting industry with innovative prediction market offerings.

yahoo
January 24, 2025
Crypto
Read article

Related news