The Supreme Court now has a chance to have the final say on Trump's tariffs

Key Points

  • Two toy companies, Learning Resources and Hand2Mind, have petitioned the Supreme Court to fast-track their lawsuit against President Trump's tariffs, challenging his authority to impose these duties.
  • The tariffs, justified by Trump under a national emergency related to illegal immigration and drug flows, are contested as unauthorized since they do not directly address the stated emergency.
  • A lower court ruling at the US Court of International Trade sided with businesses against Trump's authority under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, though Trump's tariffs remain in effect pending appeal.
  • The toy companies argue the tariffs impose a significant economic burden, potentially increasing taxes on Americans by $660 billion annually and raising the Consumer Price Index by 2%.
  • Legal experts anticipate the Supreme Court will eventually address the legality of Trump's tariff justifications, possibly invoking the "major questions doctrine" to limit executive overreach.

Summary

Two toy companies, Learning Resources and Hand2Mind, have urged the Supreme Court to expedite their lawsuit challenging President Trump's tariffs, questioning his authority to impose them under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act. The tariffs, linked to a national emergency over illegal immigration and drug trafficking, are contested as unrelated to the stated crisis. While a US Court of International Trade panel ruled against Trump's authority, the tariffs remain active during an appeal at the Federal Circuit. The companies, having secured a limited victory in a district court, seek Supreme Court intervention before the court's summer recess, citing severe economic impacts, including a potential $660 billion annual tax hike and a 2% rise in the Consumer Price Index. The US average tariff rate has surged from 2.5% to 27%, the highest in over a century. Legal experts predict the Supreme Court will ultimately address the tariffs' legality, potentially under the "major questions doctrine" limiting executive actions without explicit Congressional approval. The Trump administration, referencing a successful Nixon-era tariff appeal, remains confident in its legal stance.

yahoo
June 18, 2025
Stocks
Read article

Related news