Trump tariffs panned by Bernanke, Yellen in Supreme Court filing

Key Points

  • Prominent Economists' Opposition: Nearly 50 economists, including former Federal Reserve Chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, have urged the US Supreme Court to overturn most of President Donald Trump’s global tariffs, arguing they are based on misconceptions about trade deficits and the global economy.**
  • Economic Impact: The economists warn that Trump's tariffs will not resolve trade deficits but will instead have a profound economic impact, costing trillions of dollars and affecting every household and state in the US.**
  • Legal Challenge: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Trump’s tariffs under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act during oral arguments on November 5, amidst various friend-of-the-court briefs from supporters and challengers.**
  • Diverse Support: The economists filing the brief represent a wide range of political views and backgrounds, including former officials from both Republican and Democratic administrations, highlighting a broad consensus against the tariffs.**

Summary

A group of nearly 50 prominent economists, including former Federal Reserve Chairs Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, has filed a brief urging the US Supreme Court to overturn President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs. They argue that the tariffs, justified by the Trump administration as a response to trade deficits deemed a national emergency under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, are based on flawed economic reasoning. The economists assert that trade deficits are a normal aspect of global trade and that the tariffs will not resolve them but will instead impose trillions of dollars in economic costs, impacting every American household. The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on November 5 to determine the legality of these tariffs, with additional briefs from former judges, national security experts, and businesses challenging Trump’s policies. Meanwhile, the administration defends the tariffs as essential to national economic security, while critics, including small businesses and Democratic-led states, call them an illegal tax burden. The debate underscores broader tensions over presidential authority in trade policy and the economic consequences of protectionist measures.

yahoo
October 25, 2025
Stocks
Read article

Related news